Yup, politics is about chices. As the article effectivey points out republicans have, for far too long, been making the exact wrong choices. With any luck the party supporting Dotard tRump will completely self destruct . From this erson’s erspective t cannpt happen soon enough.
President Trump, claiming he would love to talk to Mueller has said the questioning must be “fair” for him to do so. Stating his attorneys have advised him to not speak with Mueller he also said he would override their advise if he could find a way to insure the questioning was “fair”.
REUTERS – President Donald Trump said on Friday shifted his position over possible talks with U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, saying his lawyers have advised him against any talks but that he would submit to questioning if it was “fair.”
Trump has repeatedly said he wanted to talk to Mueller, a fellow Republican investigating alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. 2016 election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.
“I would love to speak. I would love to. Nobody wants to speak more than me … because we’ve done nothing wrong,” Trump told reporters outside the White House on his way to the NRA Convention in Dallas. “But I have to find a way to be treated fairly.”
“If I thought it was fair, I would override my lawyer,” he added.
Of course Trump’s statement is really saying that he is willing to talk with Mueller if the questions are softball tosses and lead to the conclusion of the investigation with judgment exactly as Trump desires. In other words Trump is not so much concerned with “fairness” as he is with coming out as clean as a whistle. regardless whether it is the truth or not.
Trump also defended Rudy Giuliani, who he recently hired to represent him in the matter. The former federal prosecutor, however, raised a number of questions about Trump’s actions and motivations in a series of media interviews this week.
On Thursday, Giuliani said he wanted limits for any Trump interview with Mueller.
“He started yesterday. He’ll get his facts straight. He’s a great guy,” Trump told reporters. One of Trump’s lawyers announced Giuliani’s addition to the team on April 19.
Ghouliani is a perfect addition to the Trump team. Obviously inept these days with the tendency to shoot from the hip. But he is a loyal Trumpian who will work hard at being Trump’s chump.
The president also repeated his assertion that there was no collusion by his team and that the federal probe led by Mueller was a “witch hunt.” Russia has also denied any interference, despite the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies.
Giuliani’s “learning the subject matter. … He knows this is a witch hunt. That’s what he knows,” Trump added.
Trump continuing to obsessively repeat no collusion and witch-hunt does not make either so. It is the job of Mueller to get to the bottom of all the allegations. As a man of integrity this is what he will do. All Americans, regardless of political affiliation or economic status ought to hope he does. The continuation f our democratic republic depends on it.
In the Untied States of America right wing conservatives have been pitching the myth of Cultural Marxism with increasing intensity. Blaming nearly all current societal ills in the west as the result of positive and humane social progress they deem to be Marxian in nature. One of their pet narratives is that Cultural Marxism has taken over the educational system and is destroying western civilization by corrupting and brainwashing the youth.
The myth of Cultural Marxism is being spread not only in the USA, it is being preached by conservatives and white supremacists elsewhere in the western world. The following pictures are taken from The Sydney Morning Herald and they represent the lies the proponents of Cultural Marxism are using to play on peoples emotions and fears.
The myth of Cultural Marxism is represented in the following pictures:
As the Alt right sees control of its world slipping from their grasp they are responding by frantically engaging in the game of fear mongering. We see it employed by Trump in his Make America Great Again slogan and his xenophobic pronouncements going back to his announcement that he was going to run for the USA presidency.
With conservatives, I prefer the term reactionaries, throughout the western world hawking the myth of Cultural Marxism the following is a timely reproduction of a 2017 article in The Sydney Morning Herald.
The good news is that “cultural Marxism” isn’t real. The bad news is that people believe it is anyway.
The claim that left-wing intellectuals are trying to destroy the foundations of Western society is gaining traction in Australia.
And the worse news is this: even if the idea is factually untrue, it can still have an impact on politics.
“Cultural Marxism” is a viral falsehood used by far-right figures, conspiracy theorists, and pundits to explain many ills of the modern world.
A search of archives shows right wing columnist Andrew Bolt first mentioned it in his writing in 2002.
More recently, former Labor opposition leader Mark Latham in a column, claimed that it was a “powerful” movement “dominating” about 80 per cent of public life.
University of Melbourne international relations lecturer Daniel R McCarthy says Latham and others “are using the term rhetorically to paint opponents of their political positions in a bad light”.
“They label movements for LGBT rights as ‘Marxist’ in the hopes that this will frighten people into voting against things like gay marriage,” McCarthy says.
“This is a clever rhetorical strategy, if dishonest or, charitably, simply deeply confused.”
McCarthy makes a firm distinction between Marxist theorists originating in the 20th century and today’s concept of “cultural Marxism”.
“There are Marxists or critical social theorists who study culture,” McCarthy says. “What Latham and colleagues are talking about is entirely different.”
“Their arguments, which verge onto the terrain of conspiracy theorising, understand social movements that they do not like as part of a ‘cultural Marxist’ political strategy to first colonise the terrain of public culture prior to taking over society as a whole,” he says.
A 2003 article from the US-based Southern Poverty Law Centre described cultural Marxism as a “conspiracy theory with an anti-Semitic twist” that was then “being pushed by much of the American right”.
“In a nutshell, the theory posits that a tiny group of Jewish philosophers who fled Germany in the 1930s and set up shop at Columbia University in New York City devised an unorthodox form of ‘Marxism’ that took aim at American society’s culture, rather than its economic system,” the report states.
Unfortunately, Google trends indicate a steadily rising interest in the term in Australia.
(Latham was emailed for comment on this article but did not reply.)
A former White House official tells me that online conservative ire (Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Mark Levin, etc.). about the spending bill President Trump signed yesterday — after a puzzling tweeted veto feint — “is the hardest I’ve ever seen the base turn on Trump over anything.”
Why it matters: “A big reason why people voted for him was because of his apparent willingness to stand up to the entrenched political class in both parties. Voters wanted a fighter who wouldn’t back down to ‘the swamp’ like a ‘typical politician,” the official told me.
- “They were attracted to his strength and alpha mentality, but unfortunately yesterday’s fake veto threat did little but make him look weak … and his base took notice.”
- “Trump’s base is literally begging him to throw McConnell/Ryan under the bus after today. Just search ‘McConnell Trump’ on Tweetdeck and you will see what I mean.”
A White House official replies that a six-month continuing resolution would have led to no better outcome:
- “The veto advocates hate Ryan and McConnell. Not good enough reason for us to veto.”
- “Thought one of the reasons DJT was elected was to get things done in a broken D.C.?”
- Touché: “If there was a shutdown, would Axios headline praise Trump as shrewd negotiator, or ridicule as dealmaker who can’t make a deal to fund the government?”
One hundred years ago this week, the founder of modern American conservatism was born into poverty in Plymouth, Mich. Russell Kirk’s “The Conservative Mind,” published in 1953, laid the foundations of a modern conservative movement that dominated the second half of the American Century. But 65 years later, Kirk’s classic work reads instead as a damning indictment against the very movement he helped launch.
The central thesis of Kirk’s philosophy was that “the conservative abhors all forms of ideology” and subscribes to principles “arrived at by convention and compromise” instead of “fanatic ideological dogmata.” Six decades of Republican overreach and corrosive causes have instead led to the rise of Donald Trump and a foreign policy run by John Bolton, an economy guided by Larry Kudlow and a legal team led by conspiracy theorist Joseph DiGenova.
In the forward to the seventh edition of “The Conservative Mind,” Kirk predicted with precision the rise of political players such as Bolton and Trump and foresaw a time when the United States would “fall into the hands of merciless ideologues or squalid oligarchs.” He also repeated Swedish philosopher Tage Lindbom’s warning of the bleak harvest coming from a “secularized generation for which material existence is everything and spiritual life is nothing.”
This was the predictable outcome of my Republican Party aligning its interests with the most cynical political operators of our time. The Atwaters, Manaforts, Gingriches and Roves leveraged a weaponized media culture that reduced politics to a secularized religion and consolidated political power and material wealth in the hands of its richest donors.